|
|
Or, use your gamerDNA username: (more...)
| ||||||
| |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| You mean I can change this? Neat! Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,975
+66 Internets | Question re: Index ETFs and currency exchange So I bought in to the whole index investing thing hook, line and sinker. I decided to go with the following ETF's at roughly the following mixtures: XIC - 25% - iShares TSX index, traded in CDN on the TSX VTI - 30% - Vanguard US Total Market, USD on the Dow VWO - 10% - Vanguard Emerging Markets, USD VPL - 10% - Vanguard Pacific Markets, USD VGK - 25% - Vanguard European Markets, USD So obviously the 1/4 of my money in the TSX index is more or less immune to exchange rates since my account is in Canadian funds. For VTI, that's fairly easy to understand. If the Canadian dollar goes up, as it has recently, my holdings go down in value in Canadian funds provided the ETF unit cost remains the same in USD. But how does it work for the other ETFs? They're traded and priced in American dollars, but if the Euro skyrockets against the USD, does the USD/unit price also increase in lockstep? Put another way, if the Euro and Loonie remain the same relative to each other while rising or dropping significantly against the USD, the value in CDN of the investment would remain the same, would it not? (the price of units would change on the Dow, but that would be offset by the currency conversion from USD > CDN) Just trying to bend my mind around this, as the Loonie has been all over the fucking place for the past couple years, and if 75% of my investments are exposed to currency exchange rates, I want to make sure I have a good handle on the implications. |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,920
| Let's assume EUR:CAD trade at a 1:1 ratio and you buy a $1,000 of an ETF which contains underlying securities that are all denominated in the EUR. Let's assume the market moves and the new ratio is 1:1.15. Your investment would now be worth 1000*1.15 = 1150 Though you could convert through USD there is no point to it because every spot rate you get for the most part is based off of the 3 majors (EUR, GBF, USD) and then for any cross currency conversions they tend to just convert through USD to give you a spot rate as it's the most liquid and agencies like WM/Reuters use contributed data. Edit: Screwed it up when I first explained it. Last edited by prescient63; 10-14-2009 at 06:35 PM.. |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,920
| Quote:
So EUR:USD trade at a 1:1 ratio, and USD:CAD trade at a 1:1 ratio when you buy your 1000 investment. A month later EUR:USD trade at a 1:1.2 ratio and USD:CAD trade at a 1:0.8 ratio. So we have our original investment of 1,000 EUR is now worth $1,200 because every EUR buys 1.2 USD and then every dollar buys 0.8 CAD so 1,200 * .8 = 960 CAD Last edited by prescient63; 10-14-2009 at 06:40 PM.. | |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: May 2002 Location: NYC
Posts: 5,835
+54 Internets | Have you looked into the Vanguard Global Stock Index Fund? Seems like you could replace all those ETFs with a single one and get about the same distribution - or a more accurate one even. You probably shouldn't favor one region over another, since the premise of index investing is that we can't know in advance which region or sector will perform better. Also, have you looked into a bond index fund? I'm not sure what the current thinking on bonds is, but one may even question the notion that stocks will outperform bonds. Diversification over asset classes is probably a good idea in any case. (I say that while being 100% in stocks myself... at least right now. Do as I say, not as I do? )edit: Is there even a global long-term bond index fund? Vanguard has one for US companies, but not one that is globally diversified. Why? ![]() Last edited by Soriak; 10-14-2009 at 08:23 PM.. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,920
| These guys know their shit Fixed Income - IndexUniverse.com - News, data and research on ETFs, indexes and index funds Bond ETFs are good for exposure but people worry about mispricing since they are harder to arbitrage and and their holdings tend to reflect only a sample of the index they are trying to recreate. If you are looking to buy into bond etf's I would stay w/ iShares / State Street funds for liquidity reasons. They also tend to have bigger fund baskets which allows you greater diversification. A fund like HYG has 238 securities in it whereas something like JNK has 141 securities. You'll be getting a better representation of the underlying index with HYG. If you ever have questions regarding ETFs feel free to PM me. I work with them on a daily basis. As for interesting new funds I would look at CEW which is a multicurrency basket and ALT which launches tomorrow and is a futures / currency short/long basket. Last edited by prescient63; 10-15-2009 at 06:44 AM.. |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: May 2002 Location: NYC
Posts: 5,835
+54 Internets | Don't invest in stocks for such a short period of time. Best to just stick with a savings account for this time frame - I don't think short term CDs would be worth it. If you get an extra 1%, that's $2.50 over 6 months on $500. |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,920
| Global bond funds that I can think of off the top of my head are EMB, BWX, PCY, IGOV, ISHG, and BWZ, but I wouldn't invest in them unless you just want exposure to those markets. I can't think of any global corporate bond funds, but that doesn't mean they don't exist. Some of the ones I just listed might actually have corporates in them as I haven't really taken a look at their constituents. Last edited by prescient63; 10-15-2009 at 08:29 PM.. |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 85
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: May 2002 Location: NYC
Posts: 5,835
+54 Internets | I'd still stay away from stocks for only 6 months. The issue isn't that you're not investing enough, but that the market can be fickle in the short term. This time last year, you would have gotten a terrible ROI: DJIA: 10/20/08: 9265 04/20/09: 7840 You'd be down -16% over those 6 months. Just hope you wouldn't have to sell at the bottom: 6550 in March. That would have been a loss of roughly 30%. It's not that you can't be right... maybe you do get a better return. But the downside is just as possible, and if you actually need that money for something you can't afford the risk. |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: CT
Posts: 516
| Quote:
It doesn't even have to be stocks. I will put it in anything, but I want to minimize my comission cost by putting it into ETf's. S&P etf was my first thought but im open to anything. Precious metals, currencies, futures, I don't care! | |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| where is my mind Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,865
+29 Internets | Soriak is right about 6 months being too short a time period to invest in stocks. Also, ETFs are purchased like stock and have commision fees so dumping $500 a week into one is a terrible idea. If you absolutely MUST invest in stocks, do so in a mutual fund. |
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: CT
Posts: 516
| Quote:
Mutual funds are not the way to go. I would rather pay $7 per week to buy $500 worth of an ETF than a mutual fund that is loaded with fees, which will be a lot more than $7. | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |