Quote:
Originally Posted by Aulirophile  What gives you that idea? About the wiretapping I mean. |
From what I've read, Paul is a textualist who follows exactly what is written and not what has since been interpreted. Since at the time of the writing there was no wiretapping, the text can't be meant to provide protection against such. He manages to come out as opposing wiretapping because he just wants to get rid of the agencies that do it.
