| A House Resolution (which is what this is) can't invalidate parts of the constitution. But I think Paul supports a strict literal reading/interpretation without extending the protections as they have been. ie a "Search" being only a search of your body or house, not wiretapping or reading your e-mails...
I just wonder how far the 14th amendment really would go with such reading, but I suppose it's all hypothetical - HR300 is never going to pass.
Good post btw, Havelock. | 