Quote:
Originally Posted by Mario Speedwagon  Vorph, your criticism of the so called "fluff" in SA is just retarded. You do realize that you don't have to do ANY of those activities right? Not a single fucking one that isn't a story mission. None are required. You can be as linear and one track as you want to be(which I don't know why you'd be playing a GTA game if you want linear gameplay but that's besides the point) or as open as you want to be to all the features. Does that not satisfy both of our wants? I don't get how you can be so critical of game elements you can completely ignore and have the game be basically the exact same as VC by ignoring them. I just don't get how non required gameplay can make you dislike the core of the game so much. |
Well, like Tuco pointed out, SA has a hell of a lot more non-driving missions than VC did. And I mentioned the fluff mainly because that's what most people seem to use as a reason why SA is better than VC, while I would have preferred if they'd just worked more on improving core game elements. It's not like GTA3 or VC were perfect games that couldn't stand a bit of polishing.
Quote:
|
Edit: Be more racist James.
|
Er, all he did was summarize the plot of the early missions. Calling that racist is quite a stretch, especially compared to the way Rockstar themselves have portrayed the 'gangstas' in SA.