[Rthen]

"What the hell are you talking about?"

Class balance and game progression for the most part. Both of which have been fucked up since PoP.


"Magicians and Necros can solo just fine, even at 65."

Necros can solo fairly well from what I can see. I have a level 61 necro as well as a level 65 mage. I leveled both myself from level 1. Snare is powerful still, even in PoP. Necros do not however have the ability to out-solo Druids or Wizards in PoP. This is a significant class balance issue since necromancers are not nearly as group desired.

As for mages.. well I play my mage as my main character and he is unable to solo effectively at level 65. No Snare, Root, or Slow = unable to solo in PoS or PoV. It means exp progresison solo is not going to happen. If I had the level 65 charm spell I might be doing well enough in BoT however I do not have it yet. That is one spell and one zone however.

"Both have respectable DPS for XP groups."

I never said they did not. I just happen to see a lot of mages LFG these days. Also a lot of pal's, Sk's, Necros, and BLs.

"Paladins and Shadowknights are probably better MT than Warriors for XP groups."

In some cases I agree.. but I never said they were not good tanks.

"Breastlords have decent DPS, can slow and have some pretty tight buffs. I can't see why they wouldn't be desired in a XP group."

I agree.



"As it is now my AA exping is slow.. I can earn 2 a day if I get a group but I could go a week without getting a group.

Maybe people just don't like grouping with your whiney little bitch ass."

I'm no ones "bitch". I think you need to take a class in reading comprehension. You obviously read nothing of what I said and made incorrect claims as to what I actually was saying.