Quote:
|
Originally Posted by WillTR I think he's merely suggesting that with a game costing twice to three times the fee per month, they can focus on a specific crowd of gamers who are |
Considering the sheer amount of profit brought in qith a quality game at $14.99 a month, there is no reason why most companies do not have the funding for quality development.
I think if we saw $49.99 a month, it wouldn't change a thing - except make publishers even more lazy if people kept paying.
What they need to do is stop releasing such shit titles into the market because of the live patching process.
