Quote:
Originally posted by Uber Uberest ~Rathe Dude, read the explanations you're wrong. |
First off, I can't beleive I'm explaining this fake photo to the Screenshop forum gang, some of you are letting me down.
So here goes ... I had to blow the shitty photo up in size a bit.
1. (Red Line) shows the shadow line and light source orientation. Since light does not bend, extend it outwards to where the shadow should fall on the floor. Now take a look at the Blue Line, it's a straight line from her head to the head's shadow on the ground. Notice any deviations there? Doesn't match up.
2. Green Sections 1 & 2. If this was an actual untouched photo, explain the crop regions there. See those nice vertical splice lines there? Yeah, thought so.
3. Green Sections 3 & 4. OMG! Horrible blending there. Somebody better learn to use the clone tool a bit better. The pattern replication going down her right buttock and thigh were done by a pre-schooler.
5. Light BLue 5 & 6. Nice shadow jump there, not caused by raised gap in sidewalk section. If so, the rest of the shadow for the crack would be the same gap.
6. Take a look at the curb radius on the far LEFT side of the photo, off her right leg. Imagine her NOT being there, and follow the curb radius around. It doesn't match up with the curb on her left side between her and the smaller chick.
To many things in this photo cry PS ! And horrible PS work at that. Want me to tackle the other ones too? I can see one distorted profile of her, and another with a nice perspective trick photographers and sport fisherman use all the time.
then ther eis the one with him in the doorway, and her bending over. That would not be too hard since we know standard sizes of door frames and arches in houses, and also nice 12 inch tiles on the floor. If I'm bored tonight at home, I'll shred those to pieces too.
Granted this chick may be tall, but she using Heels and PS to give a boost. What do you expect? She running a pay for view website.
... Bonzai