Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharmai  No no no this is how you do a Khorum Post...
Khorum: I disagree with your proof. Here is proof that disproves my own proof. Racism, bigotry, cuss. |
Oh right, retard, so where did that ever fucking happen except your furtive simian imagination where there exists a PREPONDERANCE of evidence that Barack Hussein Obama possesses any of the ability you say he has?
Proof that disproves my own proof? What sort of fucking retarded bullshit is this now? Have you EVER even bothered to come up with a single cogent defense of your happy negro hero? EVER?
Did Reuters "disprove" itself when it showed how Obama
worked as a director of the Wood Fund, founded by the PLO and Hamas-supporting Rashid Khalidi. Did it disprove that Obama worked alongside an
avowed anti-american terrorist who declared war on America for THREE YEARS during his time at the Wood Fund?
Did the Chicago Tribune disprove itself when it showed that
Obama used the resources arranged for him by the arab-american influence peddler to seize his VERY FIRST elected office in 1996? Did it disprove itself even when Barack Hussein Obama himself admitted that what he did was WRONG?
Oh but Barack Hussein Obama thinks his extralegal seizure of power was OK because he says
"I think they ended up with a very good state senator."
But did the Los Angeles Times disprove itself when it showed how that "very good state senator" was actually
a tragically incompetent lackwit who, by his own admission, persistently failed to even vote correctly on the senate floor for four fucking years, earning the ire of his own party. Did the New York Times disprove itself when it showed
Obama's record of FAILING to vote at all when he was unable to gauge a political advantage, even to the detriment of his own constituency?
We know that it's impossible to disprove the fact that Obama possesses one of the worst senate attendance records in Illinois history, even as his US Senate attendance record is one of the absolute worst relative to his peers. If anyone around here had Barack Hussein Obama's attendance record at work, they would've been fired long ago... oh wait, that's right, the people of Illinois never really "hired" him in the first place.
Of course we know by now that you can't or won't disprove the London Times' evidence of
Barack Hussein Obama's financing links with Saddam Hussein's convicted accomplice. You're just gonna blubber some faggotry about how Obama admitted it was a "boneheaded mistake". Just as how NOONE can disprove the Federal Prosecutor's findings that Obama's career was funded by a
graft and corruption on a scale that is scandalous EVEN by Chicago standards, and that Obama was the most brazen and callous supporter of a man you SOLD THE PUBLIC TRUST to the highest bidder.
None of you have EVER disproven any of that, and even the slightest cursory look at anything put forth here reduces the whole fucking lot of you in squealing cries of "WAAAAH RACISM". Anytime
anyone calls you cunts out to "disprove the proof" you blubber and quibble and vacillate and behave exactly like a born liar like Barack Hussein Obama when he promises the American people ONE thing about NAFTA and puts his blatant dishonesty
on writing to a memo for Canada just in case anyone ever needs evidence for the future.