Quote:
Originally Posted by Dildo Faggins  In court cases the judge in many situations will decide this if a neutral party is needed.
Dumbass. |
The judge being a part of the government that would have something to hide if there was indeed corruption? Thanks for clearing up an obvious hypothetical statement meaning that the government hiding "secrets in the interest of security" is a double-edged sword.
Also, I'd love to know how knowing what specifically the massive war budget that is destroying Iraq is a matter of security? Like if it was revealed that the $23 Billion was used to build Weapon X, who cares? Does Dr. Wily go CURRRRRRSES and bite down on his cyanide tooth when we reveal precisely what insanely awesome firepower we're purchasing? Do the terrorists win when the citizens are educated?
If you want to dig deep into the conspiracy theories, 23 is such a bad number... and also just the idea that the American War Pigs have spent $23 Billion on secret stuff is enough to keep the machine running for plenty of years.
Question remains, Obama becomes president: do you really think this bullshit will end? He'll go down the conspiracist's checklist and say: "Oh snap, look at this: $23 Billion went to gold quail shot for Cheney's human hunting island."
If there is a shadow government, if Bush is really going to flee to his chunk of S. America he purchased and moved private militia to, you've got to be joking if you think they're going to go away any time soon or that measly policy written hundreds of years ago will do anything but help it maintain control.
I'll be scared the day that someone pretends that the mass populous knows all there is to know. I guess it's more noble to say "we're not telling you and it is for your own good."
Sorta like "trust us, you don't know how many nuclear wars we've avoided by a fingernail! You'd all be dead if it weren't for us and our military. FOR REAL"
This is my 888th post, the number of Jesus. Disbelieving it is a slander unto Him