Umm are you reading the same link I posted? There is 200 pages of text on that link (100,000 words) It is literally a book. This isn't bs from weathermen. Actually, I'd like you to point out ONE report that is from a 'weatherman' or 'journalist' on that page. Did you just glance at the excerpts from the top that cite examples of the BAD reporting that goes on and not the actual scientists reports? This alone tells me you didn't even read the article.
Nothing serious? Just one of the major problems that is brought up is that the fact that water vapor plays a much larger role than CO2 in the greenhouse effect.
Quote:
|
By calculating the product of the adjusted CO2 contribution to greenhouse gases (3.618%) and % of CO2 concentration from anthropogenic (man-made) sources (3.225%), we see that only (0.03618 X 0.03225) or 0.117% of the greenhouse effect is due to atmospheric CO2 from human activity. The other greenhouse gases are similarly calculated and are summarized below.
|
