Quote:
Originally Posted by Indiana  No, his "belief" is based on the complete lack of evidence. YES COMPLETE LACK OF EVIDENCE. No, it doesn't matter what subjective shit your uncles promdates sisters granddad experienced at his boathouse last year. It's not evidence, it never will be, its' a fundemental logical fallacy to claim it is.
As has been pounded in to your dumbass head over and over and over in this thread, but you're too daft to get it. Of fucking course you can never ever rule anything out 100 % - There could in fact be pink unicorns taking turns dryhumping Hitler and Elvis on the dark side of the moon.
However a rational person is forced to make a judgement based on probabilty, -probability based on what evidence is there.
Can we rule out ghosts exists. No. Is there any evidence to suggest they do. Nothing what so ever. Therefor for all intents and purposes, they don't exist, until proven otherwise. |
Give up. It's impossible to argue with that douchebag. Don't even try using logic either, he claims it's not logic, and only the fucked up thought processes that he has are "logic."
By the way, Michio Kaku talks a bit about Telekinesis in his new book. Basically if you in any way, shape, or form think telekinesis is possible, you're a fuckin moron. The brain doesn't produce enough energy to lift an apple, and there are equations that will tell you exactly how much energy is required to do a certain task.
Now, if you wanna talk about having your mind flip a switch to control some kind of mag-lev field to do it, sure, that's possible. But it's not telekinesis.