Quote:
Originally Posted by Eliyahu FoR That's a stellar statement of arrogance. You "believe" there is no basis of fact. I doubt you are all-knowing though. Apparently billions of people in this world would disagree with you, along with not a few in the scientific community who have multiple advanced degrees and years of research in their respective fields. It must be nice to fully exalt your belief system over that of another by claiming with finality that there is no basis of fact in it. |
Fail rebuttal is fail.
Russell's Teapot Logical Fallacy - Appeal to Popularity
There is a minor point on the basis of some atheists stating "God does not exist" versus "There is no scientific evidence for the existence of God". Still, scientifically, weight lies with the skeptic/atheist argument due to lack of observable evidence.
Next time research and give examples, with documentation.
C-/D+