Quote:
Originally Posted by I'm Rich Bitch  I will stop. I am not as bad as Khorum however. |
Oh? You haven't SUBSTANTIATED or even stated where the factual basis of your support for Obama is based on. We've gotten NOTHING in support of Obama's positions from you but feeble and transparent deflections of blame to OMGFOXNEWS and
your girlish fawning for his specious and superficial speeches, holy fucking shit talk about a koolaid-guzzling lemming. Whenever ANYONE has asked you about where and HOW Obama could change policy in any way that could possibly resemble his rhetoric, you veer and whine about how people are stuck on his stubborn refusal to wear the American flag or your
ridiculously uninformed opinions about the "flyover states" which happens to include the most radical leftist elected officials in the country including your own Al Gore.
We've ALL provided clear historical evidence of Obama in office. We've all SEEN what he's capable of as sitting representative when he funneled contracts to his patrons and pursued influence-peddlers to find jobs for his friends. There's 12 years of that sort of graft, insincerity and outright malfeasance on Obama's record but when he's thrown SOFTBALLS in a debate about one of his MINOR gaffes using the word "bitter" suddenly the whole media apparatus is a hannitized dittohead bureaucracy?!? LMAO.
What will you cunts do when the Iraqi's cite
Obama's Democrat-Machine financing ties to Nadhmi Auchi, a convicted Saddam Hussein accomplice when a President Obama tries to find reconciliation in Iraq? What will you dumbfucks say to the Israelis when they refuse to take seriously a man who sat as a director of the Woods Group, an organization founded by Obama's buddy Rashid Khalidi, an espoused anti-semite and open sympathizer for fucking Hamas?
Are you gonna write strongly worded letters to the Iraqi parliament about their "sordid behavior" in their treatment of your brown messiah? Maybe you think the Economist should run a petition and have every acid-addled hippie in the blogosphere express their disapproval of Musharraf or Putin or Israel or North Korea's unfair deviation from "issues that matter" huh?
Why don't you just TRY to show us where in Obama's history you think he could be even the LEAST bit suited to accomplish any of the lofty goals his staff has written for him. We already have a good indication of the sort of leader Obama is ever since he
STOLE his fucking state senate seat in 1996. We have evidence of how he REALLY feels about low-income senior housing and how he REALLY feels about inner-city childcare support with his venal and unconscionable pandering in the state's assembly. But you seem to think that his capacity for delivering plagiarized speeches have more fucking weight than the cold and undeniable FACTS of his history, explain that to us.