Quote:
Originally Posted by Kheldin  When they ban a botting farmer, they just gain themselves a new subscription fee and a new box sale. |
This cannot be proven though, and it would be the burden of the defendent to do so... which would be impossible. Blizzard isn't going to argue this point against themselves in a court of law.
The CSR point is a good one though. If they have to hire even a handful of CSR reps to deal with the extra load that botter petitions create then that's another expense that Glider may have to contend with. Even at 30k a year it adds up quickly.
If this is a civil case then they don't need 100% reasonable doubt, just enough doubt that the judge/jury believes botting hurts the game and costs Blizzard money.